WHY HOSTILE URBAN DESIGN SUCKS - 3 POINTS

In this post we would like to pose three most important arguments that actually expose the absurdity of the hostile architecture and urban design. In this way, whenever you get into a heated debate and advocating against hostile architecture, these arguments will definitely corner your opponent.
1. Hostile architecture is a solution to an existing problem. 
WRONG
Hostile Architecture and Hostile Urban Design never gives solution to the problems, it just removes the problem from one spot to another.
2. Hostile architecture is here to make sure the public space is safe.
WRONG
Indeed, public space should be safe, but public space should be safe for everyone. Installing hostile architecture and hostile urban design makes the space safe for one group of people and dangerous for others.
3. There is nothing wrong with design that dictates specific usage.
WRONG
Hostile architecture and hostile urban design is a unique moment where a public design is engaged with the purpose of harming group of people that don’t have their self funded nor self governed organization that advocates for their rights. This is ultimate form of discrimination.